The Most Expensive Solicitor’s Letter In History?

The file below – which is in Portable Document Format – contains the full judgment in Cray v Hancock. The bottom line is that Mr Hancock and his good lady engaged a builder, who ripped them off, then engaged a lawyer to sue him. The lawyer ripped them off too – or so they perceived – and when he took upbrage at their admittedly somewhat forceful expression of this opinion – he sued them. Lawyer sues client may not be as alluring a headline as man bites dog, but it does have a certain novelty.

Legal Notice: Martin Cray v Anthony Hancock

Let it be known that anyone who communicates with Martin Winston Cray or his firm Martin Cray and Co. of Edward Street, Brighton in writing or by any electronic or verbal means does so in breach of the Court Order detailed below and risks high legal costs and penalties. Anyone in any doubt contact Mr A Hancock at printfactory@btconnect.com he will not be held responsible for any breach of this order.

A S Hancock
August 8, 2008


Cray v Hancock - the full judgment



Back To Articles Index
Back to Site Index