[The missive below was sent November 12, 2011; unsurprisingly there was no response. It is difficult to believe this woman is not only an academic but a PhD in Law. Incredibly, in her paper ZOORA SHAH: ‘AN UNUSUAL WOMAN’ she argues that Lord Justice Kennedy is guilty of hate speech. (Kennedy is not my favourite judge; I have actually appeared in front of him).
At the time of writing - November 2012 - the appeal judgment in Shah’s case has been removed from BAIILI for some reason, but I have commented on it briefly elsewhere.
Just read your pseudo-analysis of Zoora Shah; how did a dumb bitch like you ever earn a PhD? Not
on merit, that’s for sure.
So Lord Justice Kennedy branding the murdering cunt “an unusual woman” is “hate speech” - words fail
me. Obviously you miss the point; the language used in the Court of Appeal is generally far more
restrained than say mine. Zoora Shah was a cold-blooded killer who poisoned her lover on two
occasions, endangering her own children the first time.
On top of that she solicited a hit man, told the court a pack of lies, and was an all-round manipulative,
scheming little tart.
When Southall Black Sisters got on her case they fabricated a new defence with her that the Court of
Appeal saw through. She gave it her best shot at the trial, and when that failed, she wanted a second
bite of the cherry on different grounds. Tough titty, it doesn’t work like that.
I’d wish you better luck with Satpal Ram, but I’ve been there first.
Back To Correspondence And Open Letters Index
Back To Site Index