This then is the Orthodox Jewish view of Zionism. The most important question I asked the Rabbi was how can we get these fascists off our backs? This was one question he was unable to answer, and frankly, so am I, although I can suggest where we can start. Whether or not Zionism is a conspiracy remains to be seen. A conspiracy is by definition an agreement made in secret between two or more parties to carry out something, usually a criminal act. In this sense, Zionism is not a conspiracy since there is no secret about the power of Organised Jewry or their desire to make the rest of the world bow down before Imperial Zion.
Another distinguished anti-Zionist, Rabbi Dr Elmer Berger, has written that “[Although t]here is no intricate Zionist ‘conspiracy’...Zionism has employed one of the best propaganda machines the world has ever known. It generally signals its intentions loudly and clearly. It has succeeded in furthering undemocratic programs and policies because all too few knew enough about Zionism to read and properly interpret its gaudy propaganda.” (58)
This may be, and indeed is, true, but there is a great deal more to Zionism than this, and its real agenda, though barely hidden, is, as stated, to make the world bow down before it. Before anyone accuses me of paranoia I might point out that in a very real sense all ideologies seek to conquer the world, or if not all then certainly a great many of them. To take an extreme example, Christianity has existed for the best part of two thousand years as a self-perpetuating institution. This does not mean that it has been totally consistent, hierarchical, or Machiavellian. Indeed, for much of the time its adherents have been at each others’ throats. Although one can argue that the Catholic v Protestant violence in Northern Ireland is (was?) political rather than religious, there can be little doubt that genuine religious bigotry existed and still exists on both sides. (59)
By the same token, Zionism is a movement which is as broad as it is long, and it would be unfair to tar all supporters of Israel, Jew and Gentile, with the same brush as those wonderful people who gave you Sabra and Shatilla, but in its upper echelons at least, Zionism is a movement more concerned with self-aggrandisement and power over both the Jews and the goyim than in defending the State of Israel. (60)
The power of Organised Zionist Jewry stems not from the proven conspiratorial activities of its most dedicated and ruthless adherents, nor even from its terrible power of the purse, but from its power over the minds of both Jews and non-Jews, ie a form of brain-washing. The main way it has achieved this power is by creating an entirely mythical fascist menace, and whining and wailing that Jews are special, their suffering is so much greater than anyone else’s, that they need special protection, and therefore special rights and privileges. In this, Organised Jewry have been aided and abetted by their ugly friends in the Socialist International, and the way they have succeeded is by posting a “no-platform” notice on “fascists” and “anti-Semites”. (61) The socialists (or anti-fascists as they style themselves) are particularly venal since not only have they collaborated with the Zionists, but over the issue of Palestinian rights they have fought them tooth and claw, and are fully aware not only of the depths to which these kosher fascists will sink but of the full extent of their power, having been smeared as “anti-Semitic” themselves on numerous occasions.
The pretext for the “no-platform for fascists” (etc) is that fascism, anti-Semitism ad nauseum is so terrible that people who listen to what such thoroughly evil people have to say will be corrupted, if not instantly then by degrees, and before long they’ll be shovelling the Jews into the gas chambers again. (62) Along with Leroy from Brixton, Mr Patel in his corner shop, and Peter Tatchell for good measure. (63)
That is the pretext, but of course, the real reason Zionists, their collaborators and dupes want to shut “fascists” up is not because people will be corrupted by fascist lies, but because when all opposition has been shut down, the gullible goyim will have no choice but to listen to them. (64) And as anyone who has made the slightest study of the Jewish Question will realise, Jewish leaders are both the world’s master liars and the world’s greatest hypocrites. Indeed, this is what the Rabbi himself says throughout this pamphlet, though of course not in so many words.
The way forward then is to expose the lies of Imperial Zion, and this means in particular exposing the greatest lie of all. In September 1994, it was widely reported that denying the Holocaust had been made illegal in Germany. Now, anyone in that supposedly democratic country who dares to challenge the perceived wisdom of the Final Solution can be thrown into gaol for up to five years. (65) This shows how powerless these poor, persecuted people really are.
Of course, Organised Jewry will not be content with outlawing so-called Holocaust denial in Germany. There have long been calls for questioning any aspect of the Holocaust to be made illegal, both in Britain and throughout the rest of the world. David Cesarani, Director of the prestigious Wiener Library and a so-called expert on the Final Solution, has even gone on record saying that such a law would be “welcome”. (66) Which is more than a little ironic since, having spent some time researching in his archive before he threw me out, it is painfully obvious to me, indeed it must be to him, that if Holocaust lying rather than Holocaust denying were to be made a criminal offence, half the survivors of concentration camps would end up in the dock. (67) And not a few academics! (68)
As I said, we must expose the lies of Imperial Zion, all their lies, including the myriad lies they have told and keep telling about the Holocaust. We must do this even under threat of legal sanction, of being thrown into gaol alongside murderers, rapists and crooks. We must expose their vile perfidy under threat of violence and even murder. (69) Eventually, truth will out, not because truth will always win. It doesn’t. But because in the case of Zionism and Organised Jewry the lies are so bizarre, so blatant and indeed so obvious, and most of them are in the public domain where they can be exposed by anyone who takes the time to check out the facts through a decent library. (70)
It goes without saying that anyone who dares to challenge the power of either political Zionism or, in a broader sense, Organised Jewry, can and will be smeared as anti-Semitic, but the Zionists and their ugly friends have used this smear with such gay abandon over the past decade and more that the charge has become virtually worthless. And if the smear is particularly blatant, one can always resort to the civil law. (71)
But exposing their lies and unconditional racial hatred, however worthy, is not enough. We have to purge them and their kind from our media and institutions like the rats they are. We must denounce them as damned liars time and time again until the public listen. We must document our charges of lying, perjury and hatemongering and demand that our arguments be either refuted or conceded. Charges of “anti-Semitic” simply will not suffice. We must take a leaf out of their book and be totally ruthless, for their ruthlessness and their arrogance know no bounds. It is through both these doubtful qualities together with their total commitment that they and their kind have insinuated themselves into the upper echelons of our establishment, the media, academia, every sinecure of power in our society, where they have preyed on their fellow men, spreading their cancer of unconditional hatred for Western Man and his democratic institutions, and poisoning the minds of all and sundry.
Their arrogance stems from the fact that they have got away with this virtually unchallenged for so long, and now that the writing is on the wall with regard to both Palestine and the numerous proven distortions of history, they are terrified that the chickens are coming home to roost and that for them, the game will soon be up.
We must do all of these things and more, but we must also, as the Rabbi says, differentiate between the religion of Judaism and the quasi-fascistic political ideology of Zionism. (72) We have to thank the Zionist rabbi, Yaacov Perrin for crystalising the essence of Zionist ideology in that terrible phrase: “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”
Would any “holy man” say such a thing? Here we may draw an analogy. The United States is the home of many weird and wonderful movements, but one weird and not so wonderful movement is the so-called Christian Identity movement. Whatever else it may be, this movement is anything but Christian. Although like Zionism and indeed like true Christianity it is anything but heterogeneous, the Christian Identity “churches” have certain features in common. They preach a mystical anti-Semitism, dragging in not only the absurd Protocols Of Zion but the Illuminati as well. (73)
They preach also that Negroes – indeed, all non-whites – are “mud people”; in some literature the Negro especially is portrayed as “not of Adamic stock” and therefore a beast, ie not human. If it is difficult for you, dear reader, to understand such garbage, you should bear in mind that the practices of the Christian Identity movement are far less malign than those of political Zionism. Racist Christians don’t, for example, shoot Negro schoolchildren as Zionists shoot Palestinian schoolchildren.
Whatever the bizarre theology of Christian Identity, this movement has many, many adherents who have no interest whatsoever in any aspect of Christianity, God, or anything else save preaching hatred of other races. In short, they are con men who hide behind the cross. By the same token, Zionists, hard core Zionists, are political (and in some cases religious) gangsters who hide behind the label Jew.
This has in fact been a familiar pattern throughout recent history. During the Bolshevik Revolution, much anti-Bolshevik propaganda concentrated on portraying the entire movement as a Jewish conspiracy, primarily by publishing forged documents and by exaggerating the role played by “racial Jews” (74) in the movement. The most notorious of these documents was of course the infamous Protocols Of Zion. (75) Although the Protocols was in circulation much earlier, it didn’t really take off in the West until after the triumph of the Bolsheviks. (76)
It didn’t take the communists long to realise the value of recruiting Jews, either in Soviet Russia or Britain and elsewhere, and later, by presenting themselves as “anti-fascist” they were able to infiltrate the Jewish communities of the Western world to a frightening extent. Because of this, and because of anti-Semitic propagandists (and idiots) who continued to spread the doctrine of the Jewish-communist conspiracy, the communists (and later the socialists) were able to portray all opposition to their supposedly progressive doctrines as fascism, anti-Semitism and, later, racial bigotry.
The current writer has interviewed former members of Sir Oswald Mosley’s movements who have told him that if when you joined the Fascists or Union Movement you weren’t “Jew-wise”, it didn’t take very long before you became so. Because (again) “racial Jews” masquerading as anti-fascists were in the vanguard of violent attacks on Mosley, and, contrary to anti-fascist propaganda, virtually all the violence was one way. (77)
The Zionists play the same dirty game as the communists, only more effectively as by definition the Zionist movement is Jewish from top to bottom. (78) Thus, any criticism of Zionist policy towards the Palestinians or Zionist-inspired subversion and destruction of such hard won liberties as freedom of speech can be routinely denounced as “anti-Semitic”. Who needs freedom of speech anyway if such freedom means freedom to incite hatred against Jews, to abuse Jews, to criticise Jews? As the informed reader will have long since realised, Organised Jewry’s definition of Jew-hating is far, far more liberal than yours or mine. But let us draw an analogy.
In Germany, “democratic” Germany, the wearing of, even the display of, Nazi regalia, is a criminal offence. Even something as trivial as giving a Nazi salute in public can draw official sanction. By the same token, Zionists display the Star of David with pride. Yet since the end of World War Two, the Star of David and all that it stands for (79) has caused far, far more suffering and human misery than the swastika. It may even be argued that in peacetime the Nazis were far more benign than the Zionists, for although German Jews were subjected to legal and economic persecution, Jews were never murdered by the German government, and certainly their homes were never dynamited – as the Zionists have done to the homes of Palestinians; Jews were never kidnapped or murdered abroad by Nazis as were Adolf Eichmann, Mordecai Vanunu or the unfortunate waiter in the small Norwegian town of Lillehammer who was mistaken for a terrorist. (80) And certainly Jewish schoolchildren were never shot dead byGerman soldiers as has happened many, many times in Israel, especially since the start of the intifada.
As the Rabbi points out, Orthodox Jewry believes that anti-Semitism is indeed qualitatively different from other forms of hatred and persecution, and that in a sense Jewish suffering is unique. In particular it is a punishment and a suffering imposed on the Jews by the Deity to keep them in check whenever they stray from their religion. The Jew is to set an example to the world by pious living and upright behaviour. This is the Chosen Race concept, it is a duty rather than a privilege.
On the other hand, Zionism has taken the concept of the Chosen Race and perverted it until it has become, in effect, what the Anti-Semitic International claim Judaism is, a Master Race philosophy, indeed, far more so than Nazism. Zionism seeks to secure special privileges for the Jewish race, and to place the Jews not only above the rest of mankind but above and beyond all reasonable criticism on pain of being branded anti-Semitic. Anti-Semitism and the resultant Jewish suffering are evils of such enormous magnitude that any means justifies the end, their eradication. So as hate is inevitable – for men must hate – there can be no let up. The whining and wailing of Organised Jewry must continue, as must the incessant demands for more and more repressive “anti-hate legislation” and more and more special privileges with it.
Of course, rather than coming near to solving or even alleviating this insoluble problem, such measures do exactly the opposite, and for the simple reason that people who destroy our freedoms deserve to be hated, be they Jew or Gentile. We must then keep exposing the Zionists for the hypocrites and liars they are. And we must seek dialogue with the Jews, the real Jews, who, far from being the Machiavellian schemers that the Anti-Semitic International make them out to be – and that their ugly cousins the Zionists are – are fully aware of what goes on, and how the actions of a not so chosen few bring the hatred of the goyim onto all their heads.
As stated, both the Zionist movement and their (mainly Gentile) fellow travellers in the communist/socialist/anti-fascist movement have done their best to deny anyone they brand “fascist” free speech or even dialogue. But both dialogue and free speech and the interchange of ideas are possible, as my meetings with the Rabbi prove. All it takes is the will and the power to resist the unreasonable demands of people, who, like Zionists, believe that a million Arabs – or a million of any goyim – are not worth a Jewish fingernail. And the intimidation, threats, and often naked violence of their ugly anti-fascist friends, who likewise believe that their avowed enemies – ie anyone who isn’t a Marxist – must be opposed and smashed BY WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY.
A classic example of Gerry Gable’s unconditional racial hatred is this anti-Aryan cartoon which regularly appears in Searchlight, reproduced from a French “anti-fascist” hate sheet. Imagine the outcry from the Zionist hate machine and the Socialist International if this caricature of Jean Marie Le Pen were replaced by one of a Jew. Among other things, Gable’s magazine also refers to British National Party supporters as “lice” and to skinheads as “boneheads”.
Zionist student leader James Oppenheim was acquitted of daubing anti-Semitic grafitti, although according to the New York Times, December 12, 1989, he was found to have hidden a spray-paint can in his office desk drawer. (Just the sort of thing a nice Jewish boy would do). Others though were not so “innocent”. The other article appeared in the Jewish Chronicle, September 21, 1979. This doesn’t appear to have been politically or racially motivated, but this and similar reports do raise the question: how many alleged anti-Semitic incidents are in reality manifestations of something totally unrelated?
To Appendix
To Notes And References
Back To Text
Back To Introduction
Back To Cover And Credits
Back To Baron Pamphlets Index
Back To Site Index